home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Julian F. Reschke <julian@GINA.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
- Subject: Re: binding proposal (1st attempt)
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 15:15:54 MET DST
- In-Reply-To: <9301201822.AA18090@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>; from "Michal Jaegermann" at Jan 20, 93 11:20 am
-
- > > Contains definitions for data types like LONG, UWORD and so on.
- > > (Hides compiler dependencies)
- >
- > For years we were trying to be careful enough to write proper headers
- > and prototypes in order to avoid that kind of a brain damage (which
- > originated in a kinky world of MS-DOS and broken compilers) and now
- > Julian "bindingly propose" to go back to the heady Alcyon days. Good
- > grief...
-
- He! It said '1st attempt'. Please explain how I can specify a data
- type that is guaranteed to have 16 bits only by using int's, short's and
- long's? And please explain why then the MiNT manual pages uses these
- defined types, too?
-
- > Besides <tos/...> name is wrong. "MiNT Is Not Tos" - remember?
-
- Then name it <mint/...>.
-
- --
- ________________ cut here _________________________
- Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-W4400 Muenster
- eMail: julian@math.uni-muenster.de, jr@ms.maus.de
- ________ correct me if I'm wrong __________________
-